Skip to content
FM/Digital

06 · One number everybody agrees on

If marketing and finance are reading different numbers, one of them is making decisions with fiction.

1
Source of truth, agreed by marketing and finance
3 tiers
Server-side capture, mix model, live experiments
Reconciled
Tied to bank-deposited revenue and real margin

The problem

Post-ATT attribution is a consensus hallucination. Platforms over-claim, last-click under-credits brand demand, and the dashboard everyone stares at each Monday agrees with no one. The fix is not a better attribution tool. It is triangulation, and the discipline to trust the experiment over the dashboard.

We build measurement in three tiers that check each other. Tier one is clean data capture: server-side events, consent-aware identity resolution and a warehouse that stores raw events rather than a vendor's interpretation of them. Tier two is a media mix model: the strategic read, telling you how budget should be split across channels over a quarter. Tier three is experimentation: geo-holdouts and lift tests that settle arguments the other two can only estimate.

Then we reconcile it to finance. Every number we report ties back to bank-deposited revenue and real gross margin, including returns, shipping and payment fees. It is slower than reading a platform dashboard. It is also the only version that survives a board meeting.

The output is deliberately boring: one dashboard, one definition per metric, one weekly rhythm. Boring is the point. When the numbers stop being contested, decisions get faster.

What we actually hand over

Built in your accounts, documented as we go, and yours to keep whether or not you renew.

  • BigQuery
  • GA4
  • Meta CAPI
  • Northbeam
  • Triple Whale
  • dbt
  • Looker Studio
  • 01

    Server-side tracking via Conversions API and Google Ads Enhanced Conversions

  • 02

    Warehouse-native data model in BigQuery or Snowflake

  • 03

    Media mix modelling with quarterly re-fit

  • 04

    Incrementality testing programme: geo-holdout, PSA and blackout tests

  • 05

    Contribution-margin reporting reconciled to finance

  • 06

    Executive dashboard with a single agreed metric dictionary

  • 07

    Consent-mode and privacy-compliant identity resolution

The same discipline, run two ways

Lead generation

01

High-consideration, offline close

Closed-loop by default. Lead source stitched to CRM outcome so you can see cost per booked appointment and cost per sold job, not cost per form fill. Call tracking, offline conversion import, and a lag-aware read, because the sale lands weeks after the click.

Ecommerce

02

Direct-to-consumer, repeat purchase

Server-side capture, contribution-margin reporting reconciled to finance, media mix modelling above the spend threshold that justifies it, and geo-holdout testing to settle what the dashboards cannot.

What the first quarter looks like

  1. Weeks 1–4

    Audit

    Tracking audit, data quality assessment, metric dictionary drafted, finance reconciliation started.

  2. Weeks 5–12

    Instrument

    Server-side tracking deployed, warehouse model built, dashboard live, first holdout test running.

  3. Month 4 onward

    Model

    Media mix model fitted and validated against experiments, quarterly re-fit and budget recommendation.

Questions we get about this

  • Only above roughly $500,000 per month in media spend and with two years of clean history. Below that, a well-run geo-holdout programme gives you a sharper read for a fraction of the cost, and we will recommend that instead.

Want to know what measurement & data would be worth here?

Send us your numbers. We will come back with where we think the leverage is, what it is plausibly worth, and what we would need to be true for it to work.

Engagements from $12,000 / month · 90 days, then month-to-month